Skip to main content

Git Workflows

Git workflows are structured processes that teams use to collaborate on software development projects efficiently. These workflows dictate how code is shared, reviewed, and deployed, enabling teams to manage their development processes effectively. In the context of Platform Engineering, where infrastructure as code (IaC), continuous integration/continuous deployment (CI/CD), and operational efficiency are paramount, choosing the right Git workflow is critical. Below are the main Git workflows and their benefits for Platform Engineering.

Feature Branch Workflow​

In the Feature Branch Workflow, developers create new branches for each new feature or bug fix, isolating work from the main codebase (often the main or master branch). These branches are merged back into the main branch upon completion after code review.

Benefits​

  • Isolation: Each feature or fix is developed in isolation, reducing the risk of conflicts with ongoing work in the main codebase.
  • Collaboration: Encourages collaboration by allowing multiple developers to work on different features simultaneously without interfering with each other.
  • CI/CD Integration: Easily integrates with CI/CD pipelines, where automated tests are run against branches before merging, ensuring that new changes do not break the infrastructure.

Gitflow Workflow​

Gitflow is an extension of the Feature Branch Workflow that defines specific branch types for different purposes, such as feature, develop, release, hotfix, and main. It's designed to manage releases more systematically.

Benefits​

  • Structured Releases: Provides a clear structure for managing releases, making it easier to stage features and fixes before a full release.
  • Stability: The separation of development and production branches (develop vs. master) ensures that the production environment remains stable at all times.
  • Emergency Fixes: The hotfix branches allow for quick fixes to production issues without disrupting the rest of the development workflow.

Forking Workflow​

In the Forking Workflow, each developer works on a personal fork of the main repository. Changes are pushed to their forks and then submitted to the original repository via pull requests. This workflow is common in open-source projects.

Benefits​

  • Security: Provides an additional layer of security, as the main repository's codebase is not directly exposed to all contributors.
  • Decentralization: Offers a more decentralized approach, where contributors do not need permission to make changes, promoting wider community contribution.
  • Quality Control: Maintainers have full control over what gets merged into the main codebase, ensuring that only changes that meet the project's standards are included.

Trunk-Based Development (TBD)​

Trunk-Based Development involves direct commits to a single branch (trunk or main) with very short-lived branches for features, if any. It emphasizes continuous integration and delivery.

Benefits​

  • Rapid Integration: Encourages frequent merging to the main branch, facilitating continuous integration and deployment of changes.
  • Simplicity: Offers a simple workflow that is easy to understand and manage, reducing the overhead of managing multiple branches.
  • Quick Feedback: The emphasis on short-lived branches and continuous integration allows for quick feedback on changes, enabling faster iteration and improvement.

Conclusion​

The choice of a Git workflow in Platform Engineering should consider the team's size, project complexity, release management needs, and the desired balance between control and flexibility. Feature Branch and Gitflow workflows offer structured environments suitable for managing complex projects with clear release cycles. The Forking Workflow is ideal for projects with external contributors, offering a high level of control over what gets merged into the main codebase. Trunk-Based Development suits teams prioritizing rapid development cycles and continuous integration/delivery. Each workflow has its strengths, and the best choice depends on the specific needs and goals of the Platform Engineering team.